Rossi and Stevenson v. Becker
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the “related to” bankruptcy removal provision in Section 1452(a) of…
SIFMA is pleased to provide comments regarding the Department of Labor’s (“Department”) Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (“BIC Exemption”) under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). We appreciate the opportunity to comment and hope that our comments are helpful to the Department as it assesses whether the exemption, as written, can be accommodated into the broker-dealer model that exists today, or whether, as written, it will result in the loss of professional investment advice for small retirement accounts.
Although the preamble states that the proposed BIC Exemption “seeks to preserve beneficial business models by taking a standards-based approach that will broadly permit firms to continue to rely on common fee practices,” the exemption as currently proposed raises significant and in many respects insurmountable obstacles for broker-dealers, including the ability to offer commission-based advice.
SIFMA shares the Department’s interest in ensuring that investors receive appropriate, informed assistance with decisions concerning retirement. However, SIFMA respectfully believes that this proposed exemption, and the package of proposals accompanying it, are not the proper way of proceeding. SIFMA also does not believe that the Department may use a new definition of “fiduciary,” in combination with its exemptive authority, as a means of establishing a new regulatory and enforcement program for financial professionals, ERISA plans, and non-ERISA plans such as IRAs. SIFMA expresses this objection with regard to the BIC Exemption, and the other, related exemptive rules that have been proposed.
See Also:
United States Department of Labor: Conflict of Interest Proposed Rule
See Also:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the “related to” bankruptcy removal provision in Section 1452(a) of…
Court: U.S. District Court (S.D. Ohio) Amicus Issue: Whether the Federal Reserve’s stress testing framework lacks adequate transparency and public…
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements…