Rossi and Stevenson v. Becker
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the “related to” bankruptcy removal provision in Section 1452(a) of…
SIFMA is pleased to provide comments regarding the Department of Labor’s (“Department”) proposed regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) that will redefine the term “fiduciary” under section 3(21) of ERISA and section 4975(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
While SIFMA believes that the provision of individualized advice should be covered by a best interest standard when both the financial professional and the client agree that a fiduciary account is what they both expect, this proposed rule goes too far and will have significant adverse consequences for Americans trying to save for retirement.
See Also:
United States Department of Labor: Conflict of Interest Proposed Rule
See Also:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the “related to” bankruptcy removal provision in Section 1452(a) of…
Court: U.S. District Court (S.D. Ohio) Amicus Issue: Whether the Federal Reserve’s stress testing framework lacks adequate transparency and public…
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements…