Rossi and Stevenson v. Becker
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the “related to” bankruptcy removal provision in Section 1452(a) of…
Summary
SIFMA provides comments to the Chief Economist and Director of Policy and Research at the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) with additional information regarding the cost estimates contained within Deloitte’s Report on the Anticipated Operational Impacts to Broker Dealers of the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Proposed Conflicts of Interest Rule Package.
See Also:
United States Department of Labor: Conflict of Interest Proposed Rule
See Also:
- The Fiduciary Rule Itself
- Best Interest Contract Exemption (BIC exemption)
- Principal Transactions
- Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 86-128
- Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 84-24
- Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 75-1, Part V
- Additional Exemptions
- Asset Management Group
- NERA Analysis: Comment on the Department of Labor Proposal and Regulatory Impact Analysis
- Deloitte Report on the Anticipated Operational Impacts to Broker-Dealers of the Department of Labor’s Proposed Conflicts of Interest Rule Package
- NERA Memo to SIFMA: Answers to Questions Regarding NERA’s “Comment on the Department of Labor Proposal and Regulatory Impact”
- SIFMA Submits Comments to EBSA Regarding Questions on Deloitte’s Report on the Anticipated Operational Impacts to BDs of the DOL Fiduciary Rule Proposal
- SIFMA Submits Supplemental Comments to EBSA in Regards to the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule Proposal (Follow-up to August Hearing)
More Submissions
Type:
BPI, et al. v. Federal Reserve
Court: U.S. District Court (S.D. Ohio) Amicus Issue: Whether the Federal Reserve’s stress testing framework lacks adequate transparency and public…
Type:
In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements…