Goldman Sachs Securities Litigation

Published on:
September 4, 2018

Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit)

Amicus Issue:

Whether the court erroneously certified an investor class based solely on the type of general, aspirational statements about a financial services firm’s business principles and internal controls that the Second Circuit has repeatedly held are not actionable, because no reasonable investor would rely on such statements.

Whether the court erroneously ruled that to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of class-wide reliance by showing that the challenged statements did not impact the issuer’s stock price, as authorized by Halliburton II, Defendants must “demonstrate a complete absence of price impact” with “conclusive evidence.”

Counsel of Record:

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

Jonathan K. Youngwood

Craig S. Waldman

Alexander N. Li

Daniel H. Owsley

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

Related Contents

  • Letters
    Dec 05, 2025

    The INVEST Act

  • Letters
    Dec 01, 2025

    Scenarios for the Federal Reserve Board’s 2026 Supervisory Stress Test (Joint Trades)

    Joint trade associations provide comments on the proposed scenarios for the Federal Reserve’s 2026 supervisory stress tests.
  • Letters
    Dec 01, 2025

    Concept Release on Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Disclosures and Enhancements to Asset-Backed Securities Registration (Joint Trades)

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.