State of Texas, et al. v. BlackRock, et. al.

Published on:
March 24, 2025

Court:

U.S. District Court

(E.D. Texas)

Amicus Issue:

Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.

Counsel of Record:

Morgan Lewis LLP

Jon R. Roellke

William S.D. Cravens

William T. McEnroe

Zachary M. Johns

Stephen LaBrecque

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    May 18, 2026

    Definition of Equity Security

    SIFMA comments on SEC Rule 3a11-1 proposal, urging tailored equity security definitions and expert market consideration.
  • Letters
    May 15, 2026

    Publication or Submission of Quotations Without Specified Information

  • Letters
    May 07, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Trump Accounts Proposed Rule

    SIFMA comments to the IRS on Trump accounts and practical solutions to support long-term saving and investment for American families.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.