Modernizing Delivery Requirements Under the Federal Securities Laws (SIFMA and SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
Summary
Court:
U.S. District Court
(E.D. Texas)
Amicus Issue:
Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.
Counsel of Record:
Morgan Lewis LLP
Jon R. Roellke
William S.D. Cravens
William T. McEnroe
Zachary M. Johns
Stephen LaBrecque
Other Amici:
None.
More Submissions
Type:
Confirmation Letter Related to the UST Clearing Working Group’s Accounting Treatment for UST Repo Transactions Cleared Through FICC White Paper
SIFMA provided comments to the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to confirm their discussion on July 29, 2025 with…
Type:
2024 Section 987 Regulations
SIFMA provided additional comments to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (DOT) on the 2024 Final Regulations and 2024 Proposed…