State of Texas, et al. v. BlackRock, et. al.

Published on:
March 24, 2025

Court:

U.S. District Court

(E.D. Texas)

Amicus Issue:

Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.

Counsel of Record:

Morgan Lewis LLP

Jon R. Roellke

William S.D. Cravens

William T. McEnroe

Zachary M. Johns

Stephen LaBrecque

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Testimony
    Aug 06, 2026

    Testimony on Empowering Main Street by Unlocking Access to Capital

    SIFMA President and CEO Kenneth E. Bentsen Jr. testifies before the Senate Banking Committee on strengthening public capital markets and expanding Main Street access to capital.
  • Letters
    Jul 31, 2026

    Qualified Derivative Payments with Respect to Securities Lending Transactions for Purposes of the Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax Rules

    SIFMA comments on Treasury and IRS QDP reporting rules, recommending changes to improve securities lending compliance under BEAT.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Jul 28, 2026

    Prime Core Technologies, Inc.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.